
As AI tools enter clinical environments, regulators, health systems, and scientific communities increasingly require transparency and accountability. AI in healthcare is considered a high risk category, which means developers must demonstrate how models were trained, updated, evaluated, and monitored.
Studies highlight major issues including inconsistent implementation strategies, lack of standardisation, concerns around safety, and unclear documentation of datasets.
Source: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913 022 08215 8
For AI to be deployed in mission critical healthcare environments, institutions must be able to show
Many AI tools lack robust plans for ongoing evaluation. A recent analysis of deployed clinical models notes that only a minority include comprehensive surveillance.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05701
Zero Knowledge methods and cryptographic provenance systems can provide verifiable lineage without exposing any sensitive information.
Source: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978 3 031 51063 2 8
With this approach, institutions can prove that
Regulators, auditors, and partner institutions can verify the integrity of a model without accessing patient level data.
Researchers have identified the core principles of ethical data handling as provenance, protection, purpose, preparation, and privacy.
Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163 025 00266 0
Cryptographic lineage supports all five. It positions AI as a transparent and responsible tool that can satisfy clinical, institutional, and regulatory requirements.
Ethical Data Handling Principles: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163 025 00266 0
Challenges for AI Adoption in Healthcare: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913 022 08215 8
Zero Knowledge Proofs for Privacy and Integrity: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978 3 031 51063 2 8
Importance of Post Deployment Monitoring: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05701
